Where I saw this used, it wasn't supposed to be a valid URI. It was just supposed to be a way of representing DAV property names to systems that only supported name/value pairs, rather than namespace/name/value tuples. lisa > -----Original Message----- > From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:41 AM > To: Lisa Dusseault; Julian Reschke; mtimmerm@opentext.com; 'WebDAV' > Subject: RE: content type for WebDAV request/response bodies, was: [ACL] > Access Control Protocol -07 submitted > > > > From: Lisa Dusseault [mailto:lisa@xythos.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:35 AM > > To: Julian Reschke; mtimmerm@opentext.com; 'WebDAV' > > Subject: RE: content type for WebDAV request/response bodies, was: [ACL] > > Access Control Protocol -07 submitted > > > > .. > > > > You ask how to map <foo xmlns="http://a.b.c/d#e"/>: since it > ends in 'e', > > add a '#', and it becomes "http://a.b.c/d#e#foo". When going > back to real > > XML form, scan backward from the end for the last '#', remove it. > > But "http://a.b.c/d#e#foo" isn't a valid URI (reference), right?Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 13:57:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:59 GMT