W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 1999

RE: Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses

From: Jim Davis <jrd3@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 22:54:31 +0100
Message-Id: <4.1.19991130225258.00abc630@pop.xs4all.nl>
To: "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

At 05:30 PM 11/30/99 +0000, Mark Birbeck wrote:
>[good reasons that propfind should not return the ordering propery unless
explicitly asked]

I agree with Mark.  Drop the "should" from the spec.

Received on Wednesday, 1 December 1999 02:51:03 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jim Davis: "RE: are depth 0 locks inherited by newly created children?"
Previous message: ccjason@us.ibm.com: "Re: Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses"
Maybe in reply to: Slein, Judith A: "Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses"
Next in thread: jamsden@us.ibm.com: "Re: Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:52 GMT