RE: Ordered Collections and PROPFIND Responses

Max Rible wrote:
> I don't think ordering is random information.  It's only a 
> few handfuls 
> of bytes to provide information that should be useful to an 
> overwhelming
> number of clients (since I think WebDAV is going to see primary use as
> a network filesystem for quite some time to come).  I agree with
> "MUST".

I'm using WebDAV for inter-server database updates. The server 'clients'
are therefore *very* dumb - they don't care about collection ordering.

Mark