- From: John Stracke <francis@netscape.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 10:53:03 -0700
- To: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@kuantech.com>
- CC: "'Bruce Cragun'" <BCragun.ORM2-1.OREM2@gw.novell.com>, fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Jeffrey E. Sussna wrote: > As I stated before, it is > true that the implementation under the covers has to treat ACL's specially. I believe that, if the implementation has to treat it separately, we Ought To make sure that the protocol design treats it separately. (Don't anybody take this too broadly, mind you; I can think of exceptions just as well as you can. :-) Calling it out separately in the spec will make sure that implementers have to write separate code, and have to pay the special attention needed to make it work, rather than requiring them to figure it the implications themselves. -- /======================================================================\ |John (Francis) Stracke |My opinions are my own.|"How can one | |Software Retrophrenologist|=======================/conceive of a one | |Netscape Comm. Corp. |party system in a country that has over 200| |francis@netscape.com | varieties of cheese?" -- Charles de Gaulle| \======================================================================/ New area code for work number: 650
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 1998 13:52:47 UTC