I was just trying to help clarify some of the issues for Bruce, not comment on the details of the LDAP approach. My point is that one can not treat ACL's *exactly* the same as ordinary properties in all respects. There has to be something at least a little different, because the main functionality of ACL's is a different kind of functionality than that of ordinary properties. Alan Babich > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeffrey E. Sussna [mailto:kuanjes@beaver.slip.net] > Sent: August 03, 1998 12:53 PM > To: Babich, Alan; 'Bruce Cragun'; fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu; > francis@netscape.com > Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: Re: Additional WebDAV Requirements? > > > I originally proposed the approach under debate. Perhaps I > forgot I was > participating in a spec discussion and wasn't detailed enough in my > statements. In any case, LDAP seems to be able to accomplish Something > similar without getting its knickers in a twist. As I stated > before, it is > true that the implementation under the covers has to treat > ACL's specially. > > JeffReceived on Monday, 3 August 1998 16:39:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:47 GMT