W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2009

Re: [Uri-review] ssh URI

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:12:39 -0400
To: "Daniel R. Tobias" <dan@tobias.name>
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org
Message-Id: <1255396359.5481.10164.camel@dbooth-laptop>
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 19:51 -0400, Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2009 at 21:35, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
> > David, you do not see a need to define a new URI scheme for anything, do
> > you?.  If I you do, please enumerate the requirements for a protocol that
> > would save it from the http black hole.
> It does seem to be an ideological position for some.

Excuse me?  By piggy-backing on http URIs, you can get easier, faster
adoption with more user-friendly fallback behavior.   To my mind that's
an engineering concern -- not an idealogical position.  


David Booth, Ph.D.
Cleveland Clinic (contractor)

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 01:13:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:13 UTC