John Cowan wrote: > You can refer to STD 66. This is a logical name for whatever the current > RFC for URI Syntax may be. Note that only a few RFCs have STD numbers: > the list is at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcxx00.html . --------------------------------------------------------------- As I undertand you we should have written STD 66 in the XSPF spec. Any ideas what to do with the fact that unfortunately we did not? SebastianReceived on Monday, 9 July 2007 00:26:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:49 GMT