Re: [Need advice] URIs as part of the XSPF specification

Sebastian Pipping scripsit:

> As I undertand you we should have written STD 66 in the
> XSPF spec.  Any ideas what to do with the fact that
> unfortunately we did not?

Issue an erratum.  Or pretend you did.

-- 
John Cowan  <cowan@ccil.org>  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        Raffiniert ist der Herrgott, aber boshaft ist er nicht.
                --Albert Einstein