W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2004

Re: Are we done with draft-hoffman-ftp-uri-02.txt?

From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:17:52 -0700
Message-Id: <p06110414bda81ca38980@[165.227.249.219]>
To: uri@w3.org

At 4:49 PM +0200 10/29/04, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>2396bis is already in <http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html>:
><ftp://ftp.isi.edu/internet-drafts/draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-07.txt>

Yes, but we don't know its RFC number, and we won't for some time. 
The RFC Editor takes care of updating these things when they process 
the documents.

>There's still that "URIs are were" typo in the Intro.

Got it, thanks.

>Maybe add "but binary should be a safe guess" in 2.4.

Why? It has nothing to do with the URI scheme, only with the FTP 
protocol itself.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium
Received on Friday, 29 October 2004 16:17:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:34 GMT