Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote: > It would be grand to hear if anyone has any further > refinements that they want made to this draft 2396bis is already in <http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html>: <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/internet-drafts/draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-07.txt> There's still that "URIs are were" typo in the Intro. Maybe add "but binary should be a safe guess" in 2.4. Bye, FrankReceived on Friday, 29 October 2004 14:51:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:46 GMT