W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > June 2003

RE: temporal URI fragments

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:39:11 -0400
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20030625173857.030e22e8@localhost>
To: "Larry Masinter" <LMM@acm.org>, "'Al Gilman'" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, <Silvia.Pfeiffer@csiro.au>
Cc: <Silvia.Pfeiffer@csiro.au>, <uri@w3.org>, <Conrad.Parker@csiro.au>

At 09:10 03/06/25 -0700, Larry Masinter wrote:
>I think I now understand that most of this proposal is
>dependent on updating HTTP (RFC 2396) and RTSP (RFC 2326)
>to allow fragment identifiers in the request URI.
>
>I can see that they've managed to produce a demonstration
>where doing so "works" with a HTTP server, but I don't
>think it's a good idea.
>
>No matter what the syntax of the fragment identifier.

I agree with Larry.

Regards,    Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2003 17:54:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:31 GMT