W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > July to September 2012

RE: Is there a way in respec to hyperlink to external refs?

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:41:02 -0700
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
CC: Travis Leithead <Travis.Leithead@microsoft.com>, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E2DDD6B73@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
Define a URN scheme for spec references. In a world where URNs work, the source format would be better than the destination.



-----Original Message-----
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:21 AM
To: Robin Berjon
Cc: Travis Leithead; Eliot Graff; spec-prod@w3.org
Subject: Re: Is there a way in respec to hyperlink to external refs?




On Wednesday, 29 August 2012 at 10:38, Robin Berjon wrote:

> 2) Scheme-based
>  
> Just extend the current way of referring to definitions — which is simply <a>dfn-name</a> — with a magical scheme. So referring to a definition in another spec would just be <a href='spec:dom4'>Node</a> or <a href='spec:dom4#node'>the Node interface</a>. Yes, it violates WebArch. It's a source format, though, so I don't think that matters (send the Architecture Police!).
>  

I like this one. Feels more natural than the other ones - and violating WebArch makes you feel like a standards-badass, which is a bonus!
  

--  
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au





Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:41:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 29 August 2012 19:41:35 GMT