- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 11:20:32 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: Travis Leithead <Travis.Leithead@microsoft.com>, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Wednesday, 29 August 2012 at 10:38, Robin Berjon wrote: > 2) Scheme-based > > Just extend the current way of referring to definitions — which is simply <a>dfn-name</a> — with a magical scheme. So referring to a definition in another spec would just be <a href='spec:dom4'>Node</a> or <a href='spec:dom4#node'>the Node interface</a>. Yes, it violates WebArch. It's a source format, though, so I don't think that matters (send the Architecture Police!). > I like this one. Feels more natural than the other ones - and violating WebArch makes you feel like a standards-badass, which is a bonus! -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2012 10:21:07 UTC