- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:50:20 -0500
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 3 Jul 2012, at 2:25 PM, fantasai wrote: > Since Robin Berjon and I happened to be in the same place last week, > we decided to try taking the data collected with Tantek and Vincent > about what needs to go into W3C specs: > http://www.w3.org/wiki/SpecProd/Restyle/Content > > And pull it into Karl Dubost's design template: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2011OctDec/0095.html > > Here's the result: > http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/style/design/w3c-restyle/ > > There's a lot more metadata than what Karl had represented, so we > couldn't do exactly his design, but we tried to get close. > > So, here's where you (spec-prod) come in! Please comment on the design, > focusing on the organization of the information, not on the CSS (which > is a mess). Hi Fantasai, Please include two more bits: * Superseded. There should be a visible indicator (and non-visible information as well) when a specification has been superseded. This may happen as frequently as "with the publication of the next draft.") * Ready to use? There should be an easy-to-find answer to that question up front. Where the answer is "Yes, but..." there should be clues of how to get more detail. Also, I don't love "Paraphernalia". How about "Use it" ? There should be a link for errata there as well (when relevant). Ian > > In a later phase we'll pass this off to people with actual design > skills (i.e. not me), so while I'll try to address any comments on > the visual design, it is not the focus here. (Do not expect the final > result to look anything like this mockup.) > > ~fantasai > > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2012 19:50:29 UTC