W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: ReSpec: potentially breaking change (where to discuss ReSpec)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:23:12 -0500
To: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org, Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1271348592.4466.3209.camel@pav.lan>
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 13:36 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote:
[...]
> This brings me to a more general question. Quite a few groups have started using ReSpec
>  (I know of at least DAP, WebApps, MAWG, RDFa, XML Security, and I've seen commits
>  to the biblio DB that seem to indicate more) but when this sort of problem arises
>  I don't know how to get in touch with everyone. I also get a fair amount of feature
>  requests and discussions about how to implement them that could probably best be
>  discussed as a group. Should we have a ReSpec mailing list? Or should we officially
>  highjack spec-prod at the risk of annoying its current denizens?

You're welcome to use spec-prod as far as I'm concerned, at the risk of
being annoyed by discussion of other tools, such as xmlspec.

It seems on-topic to me:

"a public mailing list devoted to mechanisms for producing and managing
W3C specifications."
  -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/

p.s. I'm not copying chairs@w3.org on this reply; cross-posting to
member-only and public lists runs the risk that somebody will reply
thinking it's a member-only discussion when in fact their reply
will go into public archives.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:23:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:17 GMT