W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: ReSpec: potentially breaking change (where to discuss ReSpec)

From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:24:35 +0200
Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org, Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <35A84DBA-FA46-401E-8FEE-7F1D4584FBEA@robineko.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
On Apr 15, 2010, at 18:23 , Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 13:36 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote:
> [...]
>> This brings me to a more general question. Quite a few groups have started using ReSpec
>> (I know of at least DAP, WebApps, MAWG, RDFa, XML Security, and I've seen commits
>> to the biblio DB that seem to indicate more) but when this sort of problem arises
>> I don't know how to get in touch with everyone. I also get a fair amount of feature
>> requests and discussions about how to implement them that could probably best be
>> discussed as a group. Should we have a ReSpec mailing list? Or should we officially
>> highjack spec-prod at the risk of annoying its current denizens?
> 
> You're welcome to use spec-prod as far as I'm concerned, at the risk of
> being annoyed by discussion of other tools, such as xmlspec.

I don't think that that would be an issue, I've been on spec-prod forever and it's not exactly a massive source of traffic :)

I've now documented spec-prod as the official channel for ReSpec discussions.

--
Robin Berjon
  robineko  hired gun, higher standards
  http://robineko.com/
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 09:25:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:17 GMT