W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: ReSpec.js and pubrules

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:06:12 -0500
Message-ID: <4BC73974.7000801@aptest.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
CC: Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
Okay, that's good news.  I get tired of fighting with pubs.

Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2010, at 17:13 , Shane McCarron wrote:
>   
>> Obviously, one of our goals with ReSpec.js is to ensure that generated documents pass pubrules.  I have made a few changes to help with this, but today I noticed that the respec.css file does not validate.  I don't think Pubs will permit us to use a CSS file that doesn't validate.  Ideas?
>>     
>
> Actually, that CSS has been approved for publication a good dozen times already, so I wouldn't worry about it overly. It's valid CSS3, and degrades correctly to CSS2.1.
>
> I have plans to address that nevertheless, if only because it looks nicer (and also because I want to get rid of CSS generated content, which will have as a side effect to make the stylesheet CSS2.1-compliant anyway). It's not much work, if pushed I could do it quickly.
>
> Hmmm, I guess we should put something in the documentation explaining that we've now highjacked spec-prod :)
>
>   

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:06:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:17 GMT