W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: Scraping a TR doc into RDF (was: spec-prod, xmlspec, docbook and Co. (esp. metadata))

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 11:57:40 GMT
Message-Id: <200112211157.LAA29532@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: dom@w3.org
CC: connolly@w3.org, Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM, danbri@w3.org, spec-prod@w3.org

For those documents authored in xmlspec xml wouldn't it be more reliable
(or at least more natural) to derive the rdf direct from the xml sources
rather than from the generated XHTML? (The xmlspec stylesheet could use a
multiple-output file extension and just produce the rdf along with the


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Friday, 21 December 2001 07:04:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:16 UTC