W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: spec-prod, xmlspec, docbook and Co.

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:29:32 +0100
Message-Id: <200110171529.QAA08129@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: spec-prod@w3.org

> Q1: Are we willing to break legacy in significant ways? Could the
>     XMLSpec doctype be made more DocBook-like and vice versa?

How much legacy is there for xmlspec? In particular:
How many W3C specs use (some flavour of) xmlspec?
Is it used for anything outside W3C?

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 11:31:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:11 GMT