W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: spec-prod, xmlspec, docbook and Co.

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:29:32 +0100
Message-Id: <200110171529.QAA08129@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: spec-prod@w3.org

> Q1: Are we willing to break legacy in significant ways? Could the
>     XMLSpec doctype be made more DocBook-like and vice versa?

How much legacy is there for xmlspec? In particular:
How many W3C specs use (some flavour of) xmlspec?
Is it used for anything outside W3C?


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 11:31:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:16 UTC