W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > site-comments@w3.org > October 2009

Re: [site] specs should bear their (URI) names / comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:33:52 -0500
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Cc: site-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1255703632.32376.8.camel@pav.lan>
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 18:39 -0500, Ian Jacobs wrote:
> On 15 Oct 2009, at 11:21 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
[...]
> We chose to move the URI to the bottom and to expand on the explanation:
> 
> ==
> W3C will make every effort to make available this document as-is at  
> the following permanent URI:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-rdfa-syntax-20090303/

That's quite different from "this document _is_ http:..."

The URI for the document belongs on the title page as much
as the title.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 14:33:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 October 2012 16:21:32 GMT