W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > site-comments@w3.org > October 2009

Re: [site] specs should bear their (URI) names / comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:46:49 -0500
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, site-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <DCAB0DC4-8AFA-405A-B405-3A1404576B1B@w3.org>
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>

On 15 Oct 2009, at 6:39 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote:

>
> On 15 Oct 2009, at 11:21 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
>
>> The new design doesn't seem to have the URI of "this version"
>> prominently on the title page any longer.
>>
>> That's a serious bug, IMO. Please fix.
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> We've rolled back the reformatted specs. It won't be a problem.
>
> The URI is at the bottom of the reformatted specs, for what that's  
> worth:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-rdfa-syntax-20090303/#doc-status
>
> We chose to move the URI to the bottom and to expand on the  
> explanation:
>
> ==
> W3C will make every effort to make available this document as-is at  
> the following permanent URI:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-rdfa-syntax-20090303/
> To find the latest version of this specification, use the following  
> URI (or consult the full history of the specification):
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax
> ===

One other note before I forget: in print mode, the latest version URI  
is displayed in the metadata table at the top. I realize that's not  
the doc identifier, but the idea was that with a printed copy, you'd  
find the latest version near the top.

  _ Ian
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)    http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel:                                      +1 718 260 9447
Received on Thursday, 15 October 2009 23:46:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 October 2012 16:21:32 GMT