Re: [site] specs should bear their (URI) names / comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126

On 15 Oct 2009, at 6:39 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote:

>
> On 15 Oct 2009, at 11:21 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
>
>> The new design doesn't seem to have the URI of "this version"
>> prominently on the title page any longer.
>>
>> That's a serious bug, IMO. Please fix.
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> We've rolled back the reformatted specs. It won't be a problem.
>
> The URI is at the bottom of the reformatted specs, for what that's  
> worth:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-rdfa-syntax-20090303/#doc-status
>
> We chose to move the URI to the bottom and to expand on the  
> explanation:
>
> ==
> W3C will make every effort to make available this document as-is at  
> the following permanent URI:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-rdfa-syntax-20090303/
> To find the latest version of this specification, use the following  
> URI (or consult the full history of the specification):
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax
> ===

One other note before I forget: in print mode, the latest version URI  
is displayed in the metadata table at the top. I realize that's not  
the doc identifier, but the idea was that with a printed copy, you'd  
find the latest version near the top.

  _ Ian
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)    http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel:                                      +1 718 260 9447

Received on Thursday, 15 October 2009 23:46:51 UTC