W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > March 2019

Re: W3C Graph Data Workshop trip report

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:37:16 +0000
Message-ID: <5C876FBC.5000307@ninebynine.org>
To: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hi Hugh,

I don't know much, so this may not be very helpful, but... I know of a group in 
Amsterdam [1] who are using GraphQL as an interface for accessing linked data 
(stored as triples internally).  Handling URIs in GraphQL poses some challenges 
- IIRC, they use a form of prefix+name mangling to conform to GraphQL naming. 
(It had occurred to me that it might be cleaner if at least CURIE syntax could 
be used for names in the graph queries but, hey, syntax!).

#g
--

[1] https://www.huygens.knaw.nl/timbuctoo/?lang=en


On 11/03/2019 22:03, Hugh Glaser wrote:
> Hi Juan,
> Many thanks.
> I know this is the SemWeb group; although the thing that interests me is Linked Data, which is sort of related.
> I don't want to cross-post, so I'll just ask here.
>
> So was there anyone at the workshop interested in Linked Data?
>
> Specifically how LD-style URIs relate to PGs and Neo4J?
> That is, PGs relating to the core LD stuff: resolvable and globally addressable IDs.
> I see little or no mention of IDs, URIs or anything like that, and any implications that would have for the PG technologies.
>
> Is no-one interested in that?
> I would have asked in person, but sadly I was not chosen to be invited ;-) - I'm guessing because such interests are not widely shared (I never saw the criteria for choosing invitees).
>
> Or maybe everyone understands it all, and it isn't a big issue - if so, can anyone point my at a simple exposition of the issues please?
>
> Best
> Hugh
>
>> On 8 Mar 2019, at 18:42, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I wrote my trip report on the W3C Graph Data workshop: http://www.juansequeda.com/blog/2019/03/08/w3c-graph-data-workshop-trip-report/
>>
>> It was a successful event! In a nutshell
>> – There is a unified and vibrant graph community.
>> – A W3C Business Group will be formed and serve as a liaison between different interested parties.
>> – There is a push for RDF*/SPARQL* to be a W3C Member submission.
>> – There is interest to standardize a Property Graph data model with a schema.
>> – There is interest to standardize mappings between Property Graphs and RDF.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Juan
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Juan Sequeda, Ph.D
>> www.juansequeda.com
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2019 08:37:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 12 March 2019 08:37:45 UTC