W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > August 2015

Re: Updating the VoID spec

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:25:26 +0100
To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
Message-ID: <55C1F2A6.8070807@w3.org>
Hi Dave,

On 05/08/2015 11:39, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Do you really mean to change the namespace?

No, of course not, for the reasons you cite. But as of now, the owners 
of the vocab *have* moved it to a new location (and promised to get 
*that* back online) and, as there's a doc in /TR space that refers to 
it, something needs to be updated on our side.

Something like this has been lurking as a future problem for a long time 
of course so part of my strategy here is to see how the community at 
large reacts to this real world case - and then see how W3C might be 
able to help, bearing in mind all the usual sustainability issues.

Phil.

>
> That would mean that all existing tools that access void would cease to
> work on new data and would have to be rewritten to look for properties
> in both namespaces and/or all existing datasets mentioning void would
> have to be rewritten to be conformant with the revised spec.
>
> The vocabulary ceasing to dereference is a minor inconvenience. Changing
> the namespace impacts all data and is a *much* bigger deal.
>
> An alternative might be to leave the namespace unchanged but add a
> comment in the document that the namespace no longer resolves and that
> copies of the vocabulary can be obtained from X (whether that's Insight
> or W3c or both).
>
> Dave
>
> On 05/08/15 11:17, Phil Archer wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Following the demise of rdfs.org [1] and INSIGHT's statement of intent
>> to maintain vocab.deri.ie [2], we need to update the specification
>> document at http://www.w3.org/TR/void/
>>
>> The current version [3] points to the rdfs.org namespace of course.
>>
>> I've created a GitHub repository for the SWIG [4] and, within that, have
>> had a first pass at updating the voID document [5].
>>
>> The offer remains on the table to host the VoID vocabulary at
>> www.w3.org/ns/void. At the time of writing, vocab.deri.ie remains
>> unavailable.
>>
>> The major change is, of course, the change in namespace, but there are
>> many references in that document that are out of date so I've had to do
>> more than just search and replace the namespace URI. For example, since
>> VoID was written, RDF 1.1 has been finalised etc. Changes are listed in
>> the change log at the end of the document.
>>
>> The W3C process for updating the document is pretty simple in this case
>> [6]. We just need to make sure that members of this Interest Group -
>> i.e. this mailing list - are content with the changes and then Dan, as
>> SWIG chair, can call a vote (by e-mail).
>>
>> The doc in the GH repo has a suggested date for the new publication of
>> 18 August but there's no need to feel tied to that. If you want write
>> access to the repo, please just let me know your relevant ID.
>> Suggestions for improvements are welcome of course.
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Phil.
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2015Aug/0010.html
>> [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2015Aug/0013.html
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/NOTE-void-20110303/
>> [4] https://github.com/w3c/swig/
>> [5] http://w3c.github.io/swig/void/
>> [6] http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#Note
>>
>>
>
>

-- 


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2015 11:26:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:43:02 UTC