W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > September 2010

Re: SPDX

From: Peter Williams <pezra@barelyenough.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:33:20 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTimT-eKCg16tMyycedgsrNenLt3mQ0+=HK3Shcwi@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Martin Hepp
<martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
> Hi Peter:
>
> It would make sense to make a license of your ontology a subclass of
>
>        http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#BusinessFunction
>
> since that really is a class representing specifications of access rights to
> a resource (with "Sell" and "LeaseOut" bying very generic, retail-oriented
> instances).

Perhaps.  That seems a stretch to me.
<http://purl.org/dc/terms/LicenseDocument> seems like a more logical
superclass to me.  What would be the advantage of using
BusinessFunction rather than dc:LicenseDocument?

Peter
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 17:33:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:38 GMT