- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:26:07 +0200
- To: Peter Williams <pezra@barelyenough.org>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Hi Peter: It would make sense to make a license of your ontology a subclass of http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#BusinessFunction since that really is a class representing specifications of access rights to a resource (with "Sell" and "LeaseOut" bying very generic, retail-oriented instances). So any kind of more specific rights bundles should be instances of that class, too. Martin On 09.09.2010, at 23:32, Peter Williams wrote: > Hi all, > > The SPDX[1] group is creating an interchange format to describe > "components, licenses and copyrights associated with a software > package". Basically, SPDX will allow the licenses, copyrights and > provenance of each file in a software package (think, tarball) to be > described. > > The group has chosen RDF XML as the (primary) syntax for data > interchange. The focus of the group is data interchange between a > limited number of parties (rather than general semantic web > applications). However, there is a desire to have the results of this > effort be useful beyond the initial use cases. > > The efforts to date have been largely toward building a consensus > around the domain issues and use cases. However, we have recently > started to work on the technical details of modeling this consensus in > RDF. > > If anyone on this list is interested in this domain, we would welcome > the expertise of some seasoned (or even not so seasoned) RDF > practitioners. > > Peter Williams > > [1]: http://www.spdx.org/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 09:26:46 UTC