- From: Dieter Fensel <dieter.fensel@sti2.at>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:09:41 +0100
- To: paoladimaio10@googlemail.com,Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
At 11:58 22.12.2010, Paola Di Maio wrote: >Hugh > >sounds like a good point to me, > > academically, a desperate research question emerges: >Why do semantic technologies vendors do not use RDF to describe >their info-data? Excellent point. >Assuming many of their representatives are on this list or within the >reach of foaf networks, it should not be difficult to issue a polite >suggestion (read: tall order?) > >materially it should be trivial, and by next week or early January we >should be able to assemble Dieter's list via query output Man against machine. I take the challenge! >If however there are good reasons for these companies not to publish >RDF, then these reasons should be compiled in a report and analysed in >detail for clues pointing to >>rdf what's next Good point again, however, I think the reason may be simple. Their potential customers do not (yet?) find them through search on the semantic web. --------------------------------- Dieter Fensel Director STI Innsbruck University Innsbruck http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/ phone: +43-512-507-6488/5 fax: +43-512-507-9872
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2010 11:10:19 UTC