At 23:06 20.12.2010, Michael F Uschold wrote: >Dieter, > >This is a fabulous idea. There is at least on major shortcoming: >you forgot to include the company I work for >(<http://semanticarts.com>Semantic Arts :-)). I'll make sure you >get an entry from us. > >Seriously, I'm delighted to see this happen. I do wonder how you >may attempt to draw the line that defines "semantic >technology". There will always be grayness. If it is too broad, the >usefulness of this list could decrease. That could be ameliorated by >a rich set of semantic technology categories, so a person could >focus on a particular technology are, or ignore other ones. I.e one >facet could be 'type of technology" which could include > > * NLP, with sub-categories including sentiment analysis > * Triple stores > * Latent-semantic technology > * etc... >I look forward to seeing this in the linked data cloud! And I am looking forward to seeing you doing it :-) --------------------------------- Dieter Fensel Director STI Innsbruck University Innsbruck http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/ phone: +43-512-507-6488/5 fax: +43-512-507-9872
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2010 10:14:17 UTC