W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2008

Re: RDFa test suite

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:01:06 +0100
Message-ID: <491B3602.7050104@w3.org>
To: Christoph LANGE <ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>
CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>

Thank you for using EARL as an output format! :)

Note: you may also want to consider the "HTTP Vocabulary in RDF" [1] and 
"Representing Content in RDF" [2] do describe the resources tested with 
more details than the URI alone (for example, if the HTTP headers used 
we significant for the outcome of the test):

[1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF/>
[2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF/>


Christoph LANGE wrote:
> Dear all,
>   as I'm working on an RDFa extractor, I would like to run it on a
> standardized set of tests.  When searching for a test suite, I found several
> results, some of which seemed to be outdated.  Could you tell me whether
> http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/rdfa-test-harness/ is up to date?
> My background: I'm currently adding RDFa support to the Krextor XML->RDF
> extraction framework (http://kwarc.info/projects/krextor/).  My motivation is
> the introduction of RDFa into the mathematical markup language OMDoc
> (http://omdoc.org), and later maybe other semantic markup languages, in order
> to get a more scalable metadata framework.  But, as only XHTML+RDFa has been
> specified so far, I would first like to test my implementation on that, to see
> if it works at all.
> Cheers, and thanks,
> Christoph

Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2008 20:01:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:42:08 UTC