- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:07:42 +0100
- To: Christoph LANGE <ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>
- CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Sorry, was thanking the wrong person... Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > > Thank you for using EARL as an output format! :) > > Note: you may also want to consider the "HTTP Vocabulary in RDF" [1] and > "Representing Content in RDF" [2] do describe the resources tested with > more details than the URI alone (for example, if the HTTP headers used > we significant for the outcome of the test): > > [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF/> > [2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF/> > > Best, > Shadi > > > Christoph LANGE wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> as I'm working on an RDFa extractor, I would like to run it on a >> standardized set of tests. When searching for a test suite, I found >> several >> results, some of which seemed to be outdated. Could you tell me whether >> http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/rdfa-test-harness/ is up to date? >> >> My background: I'm currently adding RDFa support to the Krextor XML->RDF >> extraction framework (http://kwarc.info/projects/krextor/). My >> motivation is >> the introduction of RDFa into the mathematical markup language OMDoc >> (http://omdoc.org), and later maybe other semantic markup languages, >> in order >> to get a more scalable metadata framework. But, as only XHTML+RDFa >> has been >> specified so far, I would first like to test my implementation on >> that, to see >> if it works at all. >> >> Cheers, and thanks, >> >> Christoph >> > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2008 20:08:18 UTC