Excerpts from Kingsley Idehen's message of Wed May 14 16:08:39 -0400 2008: > Okay, the JDBC bit is good, and we can easily test Owlgres against > Virtuoso JDBC. But of course, we end up with the obvious question: Why > are we using JDBC to talk to a DBMS engine equipped with a Quad Store? I don't know, Kingsley, why are you doing that? We're *not* doing that presently, so it's not a super interesting question for *us*. YMMV. > We've been through this re. recent work relating to new Model Providers > for Sesame, Jena, and Redland (all of which offer SQL DBMS and Graph > Model persistence APIs). Okay, I guess I'm just not clever enough to realize what anything you all have been doing with those systems has anything to do with what we're doing? > I am trying to determine if we've ended up with two things that are > artificially disconnected :-) Only under a robust, extensive set of assumptions that I guarantee "we" do not share. :> Cheers, KendallReceived on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 20:36:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 14 May 2008 20:36:49 GMT