W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2008

Re: citation on triple size

From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 08:48:24 -0500
Cc: <semantic-web@w3c.org>
Message-Id: <0E9506C7-5972-4BDF-AEBC-ADD745A29BA3@w3.org>
To: <editor@content-wire.com>
There are several snapshots of it at http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://copia.ogbuji.net/blog/2005-10-28/Addressing
the latest being at http://web.archive.org/web/20070608070115/http://copia.ogbuji.net/blog/2005-10-28/Addressing

Lucky Brewster is looking after this web thing when other people let  
bits rot :)

Seems to be Uche's.

I'd note that the thesis of his post, that stores don't scale beyond  
5-10 million triples, is hard to defend given the 5-10 trillion triple  
stores kicking around.

Tim

On 2008-01 -27, at 07:48, <editor@content-wire.com> wrote:

> Hello again...
>
> I wonder if anyone has any comment on the quote below -
>
> I have lost the author of the quote, cannot access the post anymore
> anyone on this list is to be credited for this? anyone disagrees?
> thanks
> PDM
>
>
> The size of a graph is the number of edges and the order of a graph  
> is the number of nodes within the graph. RDF is a Resource  
> Description Framework (to represent what is known about a resource)  
> so itís not surprising that RDF graphs will almost always have a  
> much larger size than order. Itís also not surprising that most  
> performance analysis made across RDF implementations focus mostly on  
> triple size.[i]
>
> http://copia.ogbuji.net/blog/2005-10-28/Addressing
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 27 January 2008 13:48:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:20 GMT