W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > August 2008

Re: rdf in xproc

From: Leigh Dodds <leigh@ldodds.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:27:05 +0100
Message-ID: <4393527c0808220127w3bc71bc1x2d1f051e9605c6d1@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Paul Tyson" <phtyson@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: "semantic-web at W3C" <semantic-web@w3c.org>, public-sparql-dev@w3.org, ndw@nwalsh.com

Hi,

I have to admit to being in two minds about this. On the one hand, I
think it'd be great for
there to be a SPARQL processing step in XProc, but on the other hand,
I'm not really
sure whether it really belongs in the core XProc spec.

As its stands you can do some RDF/XML processing in XProc as it is:

* use XSLT to generate RDF/XML from arbitrary XML documents
* use the http request support to invoke a SPARQL endpoint and process
  the results to add to the XML being processed
* transform RDF/XML (probably constrained subsets)
* extra data from RDF/XML (again, probably subsets)
* using extension points to include native SPARQL or other operations
(e.g. putting RDF/XML into a store)

So, RDF/XML processing seems to be as well supported in XProc as any other
vocabulary. I think it'd make more sense to layer on additional
support using the
existing extension points in the language. If a "p:sparql" operation
were included
directly in the core then this would further raise the bar for an
XProc implementor.

IMO then, it would be better to pursue this as a community activity as Norm
suggested. We could define a ex:sparql step via a community created spec
and illustrate the utility by providing an implementation for one of
the existing Xproc
processors.

Cheers,

L.

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> XProc [1] is in Last Call, and as it stands has no built-ins for RDF
> processing.  Do any in the community agree with me that having some standard
> pipeline facilities for RDF processing would be a good thing?
>
> See xproc comment thread on this topic starting at [2].  The chair of the
> XProc WG will entertain proposals for a few RDF-related steps to be added to
> v1.0, and is looking to the RDF community to spec these out.
>
> This is a request for comments on this topic.  I am also seeking comments on
> how best to pursue this (assuming there is enough interest) so as to provide
> the XProc WG with a viable proposal in a relatively short time.
>
> Thanks,
> --Paul
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xproc-20080814/
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-comments/2008Aug/0009.html
>
>
Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 08:27:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:24 GMT