Hi, Simon! Simon Schenk wrote: >Networked Graphs are an extension of named graphs, which allow >to define >a graph both extensionally by listing triples (as in named graphs), but >also intensionally through views. Views are expressed using SPARQL >queries and are included into graphs using a simple RDF syntax. To >express that some graph G should contain the results of a query Q, we >simply add a statement (G ng:definedBy Q^^ng:Query) to G. Views can use >negation as failure, just as normal SPARQL queries and can recursively >depend on each other. The reasoning engine will resolve this recursion. >A graph can at the same time contain intensionally and extensionally >defined statements. To see if I correctly understand this idea: Am I allowed to do the following graph specification: G { s p o . } G ng:definedBy Q1^^ng:Query . G ng:definedBy Q2^^ng:Query . ? And does this mean that G is the UNION of * the explicitly defined statement set { s p o . } * the result set of Q1 * the result set of Q2 ? Cheers, Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik Karlsruhe Abtl. Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: Michael.Schneider@fzi.de Web : http://www.fzi.de/ipe/eng/mitarbeiter.php?id=555 FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Az: 14-0563.1 Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe Vorstand: Rüdiger Dillmann, Michael Flor, Jivka Ovtcharova, Rudi Studer Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther LeßnerkrausReceived on Thursday, 18 October 2007 07:42:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:45:10 GMT