W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Restrictions on Bags and Seqs content

From: Roberto García <rogargon@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 15:51:39 +0200
Message-ID: <e56f135c0704080651y3a97a254pa84b7a60c8dd88ee@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Thank you Alan for the pointers.

If I have understood them well, they are about Lists in OWL. What
about the use of custom Bags and Seqs? Is it possible to define a
BagOfPerson whose members are restricted to instances of the class
Person?

Best,


Roberto García
http://rhizomik.net/~roberto


On 01/04/07, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is possible, in OWL Full, but I don't think using OWL Full should
> be considered to be a good practice (yes, go ahead, flame me if you
> must).
> If you want to do this sort of thing in OWL DL, you might have a look
> at:
>
> http://protege.stanford.edu/conference/2006/submissions/slides/
> 7.1_Drummond.pdf
> or http://owl-workshop.man.ac.uk/acceptedLong/submission_12.pdf
>
> Best,
> Alan
>
> On Apr 1, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Roberto García wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Does anyone know if it is possible, and considered a good practice, to
> > define subclasses of Bag and Seq using OWL in order to get containers
> > that contain a specific class of resources?
> >
> > For instance, is it possible to model this using a restriction on the
> > rdfs:member property when applied to a custom subclass of Bag?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > --
> > Roberto García
> > http://rhizomik.net/~roberto
Received on Sunday, 8 April 2007 13:51:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 21:45:14 GMT