Re: completed A-620-4 (make Expr optional in a couple spots)

On 22/10/2015 05:51, Michael Dyck wrote:
>> A-620-4 Michael Dyck to resolve Bug 29185 by accepting the proposal.
> i.e.:
>> StringConstructorInterpolation ::= "`{" Expr? "}`"
>> EnclosedExpr ::= "{" Expr? "}"

There are quite a few other expressions which use the syntax

"{" Expr "}"

e.g. various node constructors, ordered/unordered, try/catch, validate.

Is there a compelling reason why a similar change should not be made in 
these other places for syntactic consistency?

Cheers,
     Tim

Received on Monday, 26 October 2015 09:57:25 UTC