W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Changes to C14N20 for ACTION-794, ACTION-799 and ACTION-800

From: Cantor, Scott E. <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:17:35 +0000
To: Pratik Datta <pratik.datta@oracle.com>, "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CA1518B0.CBCC%cantor.2@osu.edu>
On 6/8/11 11:48 AM, "Pratik Datta" <pratik.datta@oracle.com> wrote:

>I see that both XML 1.0 and XML 1.1 define whitespace in the same way.
>
>  S    ::=    (#x20 | #x9 | #xD | #xA)+
>
>
>Are you suggesting that we put in a reference to the XML 1.0/1.1
>specification that defines this whitespace?

Yes, I'm suggesting that's better than us redefining it here. We could
non-normatively say what the definition is, but I don't think normatively
repeating it is a good idea.

-- Scott
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 16:18:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 8 June 2011 16:18:18 GMT