Re: Changes to C14N20 for ACTION-794, ACTION-799 and ACTION-800

On 6/8/11 11:48 AM, "Pratik Datta" <pratik.datta@oracle.com> wrote:

>I see that both XML 1.0 and XML 1.1 define whitespace in the same way.
>
>  S    ::=    (#x20 | #x9 | #xD | #xA)+
>
>
>Are you suggesting that we put in a reference to the XML 1.0/1.1
>specification that defines this whitespace?

Yes, I'm suggesting that's better than us redefining it here. We could
non-normatively say what the definition is, but I don't think normatively
repeating it is a good idea.

-- Scott