W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Changes to C14N20 for ACTION-794, ACTION-799 and ACTION-800

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:28:59 +0000
To: <pratik.datta@oracle.com>
CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Message-ID: <FF713B61-1622-4D6F-8735-9A247C8B379F@nokia.com>
Pratik

Are you going to update section 2.3 of C14N2 to reference XML 1.0/1.1 for definition of whitespace (as well as keeping text you have)?

I'm waiting to close LC-2484 for this update.

http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/WD-xml-c14n2-20110421/2484

Thanks

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Jun 8, 2011, at 12:17 PM, ext Cantor, Scott E. wrote:

> On 6/8/11 11:48 AM, "Pratik Datta" <pratik.datta@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> I see that both XML 1.0 and XML 1.1 define whitespace in the same way.
>> 
>> S    ::=    (#x20 | #x9 | #xD | #xA)+
>> 
>> 
>> Are you suggesting that we put in a reference to the XML 1.0/1.1
>> specification that defines this whitespace?
> 
> Yes, I'm suggesting that's better than us redefining it here. We could
> non-normatively say what the definition is, but I don't think normatively
> repeating it is a good idea.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 14:29:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 13 June 2011 14:29:49 GMT