W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > August 2011

Updated XML Encryption 1.1 xenc-schema-11.xsd

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:48:45 +0000
To: <mnystrom@microsoft.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <5969C288-10BD-4B88-9F53-3A9550404394@nokia.com>
I have updated xenc-schema-11.xsd for AlgorithmIdentifierType and PRFAlgorithmIdentifierType schema to  add use="required" for the Algorithm attribute.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Aug 23, 2011, at 1:15 AM, ext Magnus Nystrom wrote:

> I agree with Makoto; it would be better to have this attribute be required in the xenc11:AlgorithmIdentifierType. (use="required").
> 
> -- Magnus
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-xmlsec-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xmlsec-request@w3.org]
>> On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
>> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 6:03 AM
>> To: public-xmlsec@w3.org
>> Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
>> Subject: Fwd: Is @Algorithm in XML Encryption 1.1 really optional?
>> 
>> [repost to xml security public list]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> Resent-From: <xml-encryption@w3.org>
>>> From: ext MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
>>> Date: August 12, 2011 3:47:27 AM EDT
>>> To: xml-encryption <xml-encryption@w3.org>
>>> Subject: Is @Algorithm in XML Encryption 1.1 really optional?
>>> 
>>> The attribute Algorithm in complex types AlgorithmIdentifierType and
>>> PRFAlgorithmIdentifierType in xenc-schema-11.xsd are optional.  Is
>>> this intentional?
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>>> 
>>> Makoto
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2011 16:49:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 August 2011 16:49:26 GMT