- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:48:45 +0000
- To: <mnystrom@microsoft.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
I have updated xenc-schema-11.xsd for AlgorithmIdentifierType and PRFAlgorithmIdentifierType schema to add use="required" for the Algorithm attribute. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Aug 23, 2011, at 1:15 AM, ext Magnus Nystrom wrote: > I agree with Makoto; it would be better to have this attribute be required in the xenc11:AlgorithmIdentifierType. (use="required"). > > -- Magnus > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-xmlsec-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xmlsec-request@w3.org] >> On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com >> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 6:03 AM >> To: public-xmlsec@w3.org >> Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com >> Subject: Fwd: Is @Algorithm in XML Encryption 1.1 really optional? >> >> [repost to xml security public list] >> >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> Resent-From: <xml-encryption@w3.org> >>> From: ext MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> >>> Date: August 12, 2011 3:47:27 AM EDT >>> To: xml-encryption <xml-encryption@w3.org> >>> Subject: Is @Algorithm in XML Encryption 1.1 really optional? >>> >>> The attribute Algorithm in complex types AlgorithmIdentifierType and >>> PRFAlgorithmIdentifierType in xenc-schema-11.xsd are optional. Is >>> this intentional? >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake >>> >>> Makoto >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2011 16:49:26 UTC