W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > August 2011

RE: Is @Algorithm in XML Encryption 1.1 really optional?

From: Magnus Nystrom <mnystrom@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:15:38 +0000
To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D744D68428430B4F9C81DE8A4D5950681210E301@TK5EX14MBXW605.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
I agree with Makoto; it would be better to have this attribute be required in the xenc11:AlgorithmIdentifierType. (use="required").

-- Magnus

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xmlsec-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xmlsec-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 6:03 AM
> To: public-xmlsec@w3.org
> Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
> Subject: Fwd: Is @Algorithm in XML Encryption 1.1 really optional?
> 
> [repost to xml security public list]
> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > Resent-From: <xml-encryption@w3.org>
> > From: ext MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> > Date: August 12, 2011 3:47:27 AM EDT
> > To: xml-encryption <xml-encryption@w3.org>
> > Subject: Is @Algorithm in XML Encryption 1.1 really optional?
> >
> > The attribute Algorithm in complex types AlgorithmIdentifierType and
> > PRFAlgorithmIdentifierType in xenc-schema-11.xsd are optional.  Is
> > this intentional?
> >
> > --
> >
> > Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
> >
> > Makoto
> >
> >
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2011 05:16:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:16 UTC