W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > October 2010

Re: materials related to XML Security 2.0 performance

From: Meiko Jensen <Meiko.Jensen@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Date: 27 Oct 2010 19:48:48 +0200
Message-ID: <4CC86600.4060709@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
To: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
Cc: public-xmlsec@w3.org
Frederick, all,

my former supervisor, Dr. Nils Gruschka, wrote his Ph.D. thesis about
streaming-based processing of XML Security (including streaming-based
XML Signature 1.0 and XML Encryption 1.0). I'll contact him regarding
performance data, I'm pretty sure he has some measurement graphics
available. Unfortunately, the thesis is written in german, so I'll have
to translate the data before sending around.

Further, one of my former students did a similar implementation for
streaming-based XML Signature 1.0, hence his thesis contains some data
that might be useful as well.

Please note that both sources are for streaming-based implementations of
XML Security 1.0, and their performance data will differ from what we
have done with XML Signature 2.0. However, I think the advantage of
streaming in comparison to DOM should become clear from their
performance graphs as well.

best regards

Meiko

Am 26.10.2010 19:59, schrieb Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com:
> Here are the various items we have so far related to XML Security 2.0 performance (focus on canonicalization and signature):
>
> thesis re C14N 2.0 parameters
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Oct/0038.html (Meiko)
>
> Raul Benito Garcia thesis (in Spanish that I do not read)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Nov/0046.html (thesis via Sean)
>
> argument for constraining
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/performance/c14n-subtree/constrained-cases-description.pdf (constrained cases, Pratik)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Apr/0045.html
>
> Canonicalization measurements
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009May/0003.html (Pratik)
>
> probably not relevant to our analysis of 2.0 improvements, Alternative algorithms (MQQ)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Nov/0047.html (Chris)
>
> Is anyone aware of any other performance material that is relevant to showing how XML Security 2.0 addresses the performance issues in 1.1?
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
>
>
>

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. Meiko Jensen
Chair for Network and Data Security 
Horst Görtz Institute for IT-Security 
Ruhr University Bochum, Germany
_____________________________
Universitätsstr. 150, Geb. ID 2/411
D-44801 Bochum, Germany
Phone: +49 (0) 234 / 32-26796
Telefax: +49 (0) 234 / 32-14347
http:// www.nds.rub.de
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 17:49:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 October 2010 17:49:18 GMT