- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 16:10:20 -0400
- To: ext Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, Joseph Reagle <reagle@mit.edu>
Thomas To clarify, does this mean that we should expect the XML Encryption draft media type registration section to change as the process continues, or should we expect what is in that XML Encryption section to remain stable? (e.g. should we expect contact to change from "web- human at w3.org" or is that fairly stable, etc?) Thanks for taking care of this update. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch, Nokia Chair XML Security WG On May 5, 2010, at 12:44 PM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote: > I've looked into the procedures as documented in RFC 4288. It seems > like the right thing to do is to ask for an update of the media type > registration once we have published the Last Call. I've therefore > gone ahead and made minimal changes to the registration section in > the editor's draft of XML Encryption 1.1 (basically, changing the > contact from Reagle and the XML Encryption WG to "W3C <web-human at > w3.org>"). I'm also crossing t's and dotting i's internally on > whether I'm missing any procedural steps. > > I believe that this concludes ACTION-511. > > Thanks, > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> > > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 7 May 2010 20:13:21 UTC