W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > May 2010

Re: ACTION-511: XML Encryption Media Type Registration

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 22:23:15 +0200
To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Message-Id: <1C3E5521-2643-43A4-95F0-D5438DE9F2E3@w3.org>
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, Joseph Reagle <reagle@mit.edu>
I do not expect further changes to that section at this point of time.

--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  (mobile) <tlr@w3.org>



On May 7, 2010, at 22:10, Frederick Hirsch  
<frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:

> Thomas
>
> To clarify, does this mean that we should expect the XML Encryption  
> draft media type registration section to change as the process  
> continues, or should we expect what is in that XML Encryption  
> section to remain stable? (e.g. should we expect contact to change  
> from "web-human at w3.org" or is that fairly stable, etc?)
>
> Thanks for taking care of this update.
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Chair XML Security WG
>
>
>
> On May 5, 2010, at 12:44 PM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
>> I've looked into the procedures as documented in RFC 4288.  It  
>> seems like the right thing to do is to ask for an update of the  
>> media type registration once we have published the Last Call.  I've  
>> therefore gone ahead and made minimal changes to the registration  
>> section in the editor's draft of XML Encryption 1.1 (basically,  
>> changing the contact from Reagle and the XML Encryption WG to "W3C  
>> <web-human at w3.org>"). I'm also crossing t's and dotting i's  
>> internally on whether I'm missing any procedural steps.
>>
>> I believe that this concludes ACTION-511.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 7 May 2010 20:23:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 7 May 2010 20:23:02 GMT