- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 22:23:15 +0200
- To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, Joseph Reagle <reagle@mit.edu>
I do not expect further changes to that section at this point of time. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C (mobile) <tlr@w3.org> On May 7, 2010, at 22:10, Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: > Thomas > > To clarify, does this mean that we should expect the XML Encryption > draft media type registration section to change as the process > continues, or should we expect what is in that XML Encryption > section to remain stable? (e.g. should we expect contact to change > from "web-human at w3.org" or is that fairly stable, etc?) > > Thanks for taking care of this update. > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch, Nokia > Chair XML Security WG > > > > On May 5, 2010, at 12:44 PM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote: > >> I've looked into the procedures as documented in RFC 4288. It >> seems like the right thing to do is to ask for an update of the >> media type registration once we have published the Last Call. I've >> therefore gone ahead and made minimal changes to the registration >> section in the editor's draft of XML Encryption 1.1 (basically, >> changing the contact from Reagle and the XML Encryption WG to "W3C >> <web-human at w3.org>"). I'm also crossing t's and dotting i's >> internally on whether I'm missing any procedural steps. >> >> I believe that this concludes ACTION-511. >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 7 May 2010 20:23:02 UTC