W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > April 2010

Re: [ACTION-453] Review XML Enc v1.1

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:01:36 -0400
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <B26E2F0A-3CBB-44E5-B8B7-512D3CF7449F@nokia.com>
To: "edsimon@xmlsec.com" <edsimon@xmlsec.com>

Thanks for the additional comments and the update on the action.

In general, if you think an action should be closed you should  mark  
it as pending in tracker, then it will be. You should also send a  
message to the list noting the resolution, and including ACTION-# in  
the message so it is linked by tracker to the action. See the  
instructions on the group page  at http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Group/Overview.html#actions 
   If WG members don't do this changes in status will probably be lost.

I've gone ahead and marked ACTION-453 as pending.

I've updated the editors draft with these editorial comments, apart  
from #3, since I think this reflects the registration as it was made  

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch

On Apr 20, 2010, at 1:42 PM, ext Ed Simon wrote:

> Wasn't ACTION-453 supposed to be closed in January?
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Jan/0084.html
> Anyway, I have the following additional comments on the latest draft  
> (I
> think some of my old ones still apply too):
> 1. In section 4.1, replace "will break schemas" with words along the
> lines of "will often cause the document with encrypted parts to become
> invalid with respect to its schema".
> 2. In's title, capitalize the 'e' in 'explicit'.
> 3. In 8.2, do we need to still mention the Macintosh file type?
> 4. In 9.1, shouldn't the example be identified as non-normative?
> This email should (really, really) close ACTION-453  ;-)
> Ed
> -- 
> ========================================
> Ed Simon, XMLsec Inc.
> 613-726-9645
> edsimon@xmlsec.com
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:02:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:13 UTC