- From: Ed Simon <edsimon@xmlsec.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:38:04 -0500
- To: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
I have reviewed the XML Encryption 1.1 document and have the following (mostly minor) comments. 1. Section 1.3 begins with >>> No provision is made for an explicit version number in this syntax. If a future version is needed, it will use a different namespace. The experimental XML namespace [XML-NAMES] URI that must be used by implementations of this (dated) specification is: xmlns:xenc='http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#' <<< which I think is exactly the same text as in the original XML Encryption recommendation. A problem in the original (and in the Second Edition) is the use of "(dated)" in the final text when, I expect, this was to be replace with the actual date. More importantly, the original and Second Edition specifications say that if there is a new version, there will be a new namespace. Does 1.1 count as a new version? Either way, the above text seems to need cleaning up. 2. In section 4.3.3.2, change "can not" to "cannot". 3. In section 5.6, change "on-line" to "online". 4. Section 8 identifies Joseph Reagle as the contact for the XML Encryption media type. This needs to be updated, perhaps to a generic identity. This email should conclude ACTION-453. Ed -- ======================================== Ed Simon 613-726-9645 edsimon@xmlsec.com
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 21:38:38 UTC