W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > October 2009

Re: Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-10-06

From: Shivaram Mysore <shivarammysore@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <489777.55219.qm@web51504.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
To: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>, Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Regrets from me again.

Thanks

 
--
Strong Authentication, SOA, Web Services, PKI, Software Architecture, Product Strategy and Management Consultants:
http://www.TrustStix.com/ 




________________________________
From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>; XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, October 5, 2009 8:36:07 PM
Subject: RE: Agenda: Distributed Meeting 2009-10-06

Regrets from me again, I'm at a conference this week. I saw one item I
wanted to comment on...

Frederick Hirsch wrote on 2009-10-02:
> 5b) XML Signature 1.1
> 
> ISSUE-142
> How to schema validate with 1.0 schema plus 1.1 schema, when a
> validator requires a single schema file (Ed)

That isn't a correctly implemented validator. XSD generally binds a schema
document to a single target namespace (ignoring chameleon schemas), so by
definition any time there are multiple namespaces in a document, you'll have
multiple XSD instances.

(It's certainly true that the most broken aspect of most parsers/validators
is their mechanism for acquiring schemas, but it's a requirement of all
implementations to do so safely somehow.)

-- Scott
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2009 03:39:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:44:00 GMT