- From: Martin, Cynthia E. <cemartin@mitre.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:10:31 -0400
- To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
- CC: "Martin, Cynthia E." <cemartin@mitre.org>
Fredrick I agree with your exceptions. I will make sure I use the http links for the RFC's for the signature references. Cynthia ________________________________________ From: public-xmlsec-request@w3.org [public-xmlsec-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick Hirsch [frederick.hirsch@nokia.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 10:23 AM To: XMLSec WG Public List Cc: Frederick Hirsch Subject: additional XML Encryption reference updates I made additional updates to XML Encryption 1.1 references based on review by Cynthia: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Jul/0018.html I made all the changes as proposed, except for the following: (1) I removed the old XML Signature reference, retaining only reference for Signature 1.1, naming it XML-DSIG. I assume it makes more sense for XML Encryption 1.1 to reference Signature 1.1, let me know if this is a problem. (2) Used http links for RFCs, not ftp links (3) Did not add RFC 5335 as update to MIME (list in addition), since it is an experimental RFC. Please review the XML Encryption 1.1 references for correctness. I also update explain.html and the redline: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/Overview_diff.htm#sec-References-Normative This should conclude ACTION-328 Thanks regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2009 15:11:45 UTC