W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > July 2009

RE: additional XML Encryption reference updates

From: Martin, Cynthia E. <cemartin@mitre.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:10:31 -0400
To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
CC: "Martin, Cynthia E." <cemartin@mitre.org>
Message-ID: <6A913BB6ED2E2C43AC275462A83E68490C046D1348@IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG>
Fredrick

I agree with your exceptions.  I will make sure I use the http links for the RFC's for the signature references.

Cynthia

________________________________________
From: public-xmlsec-request@w3.org [public-xmlsec-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick Hirsch [frederick.hirsch@nokia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 10:23 AM
To: XMLSec WG Public List
Cc: Frederick Hirsch
Subject: additional XML Encryption reference updates

I made additional updates to XML Encryption 1.1 references based on
review by Cynthia:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Jul/0018.html

I made all the changes as proposed, except for the following:

(1) I removed the old XML Signature reference, retaining only
reference for Signature 1.1, naming it XML-DSIG. I assume it makes
more sense for XML Encryption 1.1 to reference Signature 1.1, let me
know if this is a problem.

(2) Used http links for RFCs, not ftp links

(3) Did not add RFC 5335 as update to MIME (list in addition), since
it is an experimental RFC.

Please review the XML Encryption 1.1 references for correctness. I
also update explain.html and the redline:

http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/Overview_diff.htm#sec-References-Normative

This should conclude ACTION-328

Thanks

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2009 15:11:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:59 GMT