W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Comments on Derived Key Draft

From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:40:21 -0500
Cc: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, ext Magnus Nyström <magnus@rsa.com>
Message-Id: <29A485B4-6A2B-4F3C-8474-68E62469FD38@nokia.com>
To: Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
I fixed the spelling, reference and spacing in example in new update.  
Did not change namespace.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Feb 16, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:

> Comments on Derived Key draft, mostly editorial
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/derived-key/derived-keys.html
>
> (1) There is no 2nd Edition of XML Encryption. For consistency with
> the 2nd Edition XML Signature reference, I suggest the Derived Keys
> draft reference the current XML Encryption Recommendation. (change
> link in section 1 and update references)
>
> [XMLENC]  XML Encryption Syntax and Processing , D. Eastlake, J.
> Reagle, W3C Recommendation 10 December 2002,http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmlenc-core-20021210/
> .
>
> At some point we may want to add references to XML Signature 1.1 and
> XML Encryption 1.1 as well.
>
> (2) We may remove the "01/" from the namespace in section 2 and
> subsequent identifiers defined using that URL.
>
> (3) Section 2, replace "This document does not change the URI
> associated" to "This document does not change the namespace URI
> associated"
>
> (4) Section 3.2, replace "passpword" with "password"
>
> (5) Section 3.3 replace "hasing" with "hashing", "indictes" with
> "indicates"
>
> (6) Section 7.1 replace "Amendement" with "Amendment"
>
> format example so text fits in box, e.g. Algorithm on new line.
> Number lines?
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 16 February 2009 20:41:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:57 GMT