W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: E01: dname encoding rules proposal (ACTION-51)

From: Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:47:32 -0400
To: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Konrad Lanz <Konrad.Lanz@iaik.tugraz.at>, public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
Message-id: <46796834.2050301@sun.com> 

Richard Salz wrote:

> As for the specific issue 
> of \20, the opinion was if that if W3C removes it, WSI would change things 
> if necessary on their side.  (Since it's not a conformance requirement, 
> it's not clear if any changes would be needed on their side.)

But isn't MUST a conformance requirement? Sorry, I'm not familiar with 
the WSI requirements.

--Sean
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 17:49:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:00 GMT