W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > October 2009

RE: Test suite coverage update

From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:17:44 -0400
Message-ID: <997C307BEB90984EBE935699389EC41C037C27@CORPUSMX70C.corp.emc.com>
To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
> I'm particularly curious what you think of the
> required/pipeinfo-001.xml test. I had to do a little coding to
> make it work, but I'm not sure if it's a fair test.

This does not work in Calumet. Calumet first "compiles" the pipeline
into a Java object representation, and at that moment, the connection
with the underlying document is lost. I will have to think how to
address this.

Just a question. If the pipeline document had a base URI
http://example.com/pipeline.xpl, should the following also work (without
re-requesting the document again)?

<p:identity name="identity">
<p:input port="source">
<p:document href="http://example.com/pipeline.xpl#foo"/>

I fear I know the answer already, but I ask anyway... :)

Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 14:54:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:47 UTC