W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: Mutually recursive calling

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:10:52 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0810080610i36807d71x30b148d9600b89d2@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Not sure why, but it is hard to find evidence in the spec that the following
>> sample should work (albeit I *do* want to see it work !)
>
> Section 3.2 says, in part, the "step types visible in a pipeline or
> library are ... for a pipeline in a library, the types visible in the
> containing library."
>
> From that, I think it follows that if you put both of these steps in a
> library, then they would be visible to each other. It's not clear if
> they're visible to each other in a p:pipeline, but I expect they
> should be.

I expect too, but could it be clearer in the spec ?

>
> (But don't hold your breath for Calabash support :-(; my current
> loader is a one-pass process and you can't make this work with a
> one-pass loader.)

Too bad :(

Mohamed

-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2008 13:11:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 8 October 2008 13:11:28 GMT